---May 2005
The New Trolls were sort of a what’s happenin’ now kind of group, so after their Hendrix meets classical meets Italian pop Concerto Grosso I album, they embarked on probably their most progressive effort with UT. And the album itself is as diverse as their career. For example, starting with track 4, we get the whiny pop track ‘Storia di una Foglia’ followed by the stunningly beautiful and ultimately freaked out guitar space jam of ‘Nato Adesso’. This is then followed by 'C'e Troppa Guerra’ which starts exactly like something found on Black Sabbath’s Paranoid album, only to be further funneled up and down the Osanna rollercoaster. And so it goes from more proggy parts to the ooey/gooey end piece. Did I mention the album starts in a classical music vein? These guys make early Styx look focused. Or even Mr. Bungle. 'Nato Adesso' and 'C'e Troppa Guerra’ are monster tracks though.
---8/5/23
Last night's listen concludes that pretty much sticks the landing. I tend to favor more of the romantic songwriting than I did in the past, but the rating and viewpoints remain the same.
Ownership: 1972 Cetra (LP). Gatefold; 2004 Arcangelo (CD). Papersleeve---Mar 2005
The New Trolls are heavy duty into their jazz rock / fusion phase here. Way more so than on the previous Atomic System album. Some of it is smoky jazz, with atmospheric saxophone. Others contain ripping acoustic bass, drum solos and wailing sax. There isn’t much here that tells of its Italian origin, it could be from anywhere, and is fairly typical sounding for the time. Side 2 is the more interesting of the two sides. Here it’s more of a cosmic space rock meets jazz fusion. Driven by a pretty neat bass guitar sequence, plenty of acid guitar, sax, and organ solos are laid on top for a feel closer to what Miles Davis was doing during this period.
Ah yes, the music. Well it's nice to see the New Trolls [N.T.] [Atomic System] hearkening back to their progressive rock past. The album opens in killer fashion with 'La nuova predica di Padre O'Brien' and continues down this path for the majority of the album. My recollection was something more akin to a strong opening and it more or less falls off a cliff from there. Not so. For certain, the Italian prog style's gymnastics are mostly front loaded, but a careful listen demonstrates the band is clearly operating in similar territory to their peers during this era. There's some singer-songwriter characteristics, but again, that is an ingredient of the classic sound and should not be dismissed. Add me to the chorus that states 'Butterfly' is the weakest track - and it's never a good idea to finish in lackluster fashion, as that is the lasting impression. This track appears to be made for the export market (and yet, somehow it fell off all the export releases - jeesh!), and is incongruous with the preceding material. And it closes with the greatest sin of all... a drum solo.
Ownership: 1973 Magma (LP). Triple FOC
I find it humorous that I have somehow cobbled four versions of this album. I didn't even own it at all a few years ago, and that's primarily because I didn't like it much. I still wouldn't claim it to be some great Italian prog masterpiece, but it works well as a hard rock / progressive crossover album. I've come to grips with it on its own terms. The New Trolls never had any identity, and neither did their offshoots, which includes Ibis. Their debut Sun Supreme is a classic album in the Yes mold. Their self-titled second (yes, please be as confusing as possible guys) is nothing of the sort. It could have been a New Trolls album, or a completely new outfit. Most of the album is solid, with a couple of blues / boogie clunkers. The one highlight is the lengthy 'Narratio'.
Ownership: 1975 Polydor (LP)
And so yes, I can hear the merits of the album in a different light. Album #1 is a folk / psych / prog amalgamation. Not too distant from what was happening in the UK during that era, as one might find on the Transatlantic label for example. Singing in English was a highly unusual move for Italians back then, and unfortunately it loses something in translation. The vocals are oddly affected, though I find them interesting all the same. Album #2 is a live recording that brings out the band's inner Deep Purple. The phony piped in audience noise is ridiculous, as if they recorded the album in front of a bunch of 13 year old girls - and they were Frank Sinatra. Ha! All the same, the New Trolls were accomplished musicians and the album has a kinetic energy that is infectious, even if it's entirely unoriginal.
The band would go on from here to release their most progressive album in UT, before splintering/devolving into various fusion and/or pop rock incarnations. As I said in the prelude: The New Trolls never had an identity for anyone to relate with. And thus they haven't aged well.
Former ownership: 1972 Cetra (2xLP). Gatefold
Ibis were made up of ex-New Trolls members (and a former drummer from Atomic Rooster - and whose name is not Carl Palmer) and this was their debut album (though technically the first album was under the name Nico, Gianni, Frank, Maurizio). It was far more geared towards symphonic progressive rock, heavily influenced by Yes, especially when compared against their second, more straightforward, hard rock influenced album.
There really aren't any highlight tracks for Sun Supreme. Honestly, I'm amazed this album gets the praise it does, especially since it walks right into the usual "prog is pretentious" argument (an argument that I absolutely disagree with, even here at its most obvious). And yet this album - of all albums - somehow gets a pass from the critics. For starters this has nothing to do with the Italian progressive rock movement (indigenous melodies are missing; English vocals). Not that one should get automatic demerits for that, but it is worth mentioning given the time and place. What we have with Sun Supreme is a huge heaping mess of Yes. And I mean mess as in Tales From Topographic Ocean Yes (disclaimer: I really like Tales From Topographic Ocean - but not necessarily going to fawn over a copycat attempt that falls short). From the song titles to the "higher key" religious aspects (oh hello Satguru Maharaji and his followers: Did you like this album dedicated to you? How come nothing like this from the home country, anyway?). I should offer minuses too, since 'Divinity Part 2' is nothing but a very long, and very dull, drum solo. That's 7 minutes of boredom right there.
So it seems I'm really down on Sun Supreme then? Well, no, that's not true. I do like it - as I do appreciate a good Yes imitation (heck I even adore Druid's Towards the Sun and early Starcastle). It's hardly a style that is easy to emulate, and it's good entertainment taken on its own if you can ignore the influences. I'm loathe to use terms like overrated, since albums like this are barely rated in the first place (it's not like the New York Times were pushing this down everyone's throat as the next big thing). But I have to say that I disagree with those that claim this is a classic work. It's not a classic by my estimation. Unless you want a somewhat tepid response to Yes' Tales From Topographic Oceans. It screams New Trolls cash-in. Probably because that is exactly what it is. Buy it only if you can't get enough of that sound. And perhaps I fall into that category. I can't help it.
Ownership: 1974 Polydor (LP). Textured sleeve.
I was never a big fan of this record, but listened to Nato Adesso & C'ė Troppa Guerra tonight and loved them.
ReplyDelete