Deep Purple are arguably one of the best hard rock groups ever, going toe to toe with Led Zeppelin in the 70s popularity sweepstakes. The primary difference is that Deep Purple continued on into the 80s and beyond, and are still releasing new product. I haven't heard a Deep Purple album yet that I didn't enjoy at some level. Granted I haven't listened to anything new from the band in nearly 30 years, but I'm sure I will at some point. As you will see below, the later albums are new to me in the 2020's, that's how long ago I dropped Deep Purple from the buy category (1984). I have more of their classic albums here too, just haven't penned any notes for them yet.
As for the "& related" appellation, I'm casting a wide net. Mostly I'm thinking of groups and artists that I wouldn't likely separate anyway, so might as well include them here. The exception is Rainbow, and I'll get a page up for them the next time I review one of their albums or 45s.
Whitesnake - A Slip of the Tongue (1989)
As with their 1987 album, A Slip of the Tongue starts off strong. It doesn't take long, though, for Whitesnake to out-cliche the cliche. The title certainly is indicative of their mindset. One senses at this point that they're jealous not to have been from Los Angeles. They certainly sound like it. Depraved and all of that, but musically it's good hard rock. Nothing more though.
1/29/25 (review)
Source: 1989 Geffen (MC)
Tommy Bolin - Private Eyes (1976)
Tommy Bolin's albums show up quite a bit here in Colorado since that's where he first made his name. So what do we have here from Bolin's post Deep Purple life? It's an eclectic album mixing various AOR and classic rock styles. Most of the tracks are pleasant and well written. With excellent guitar work as to be expected. I'm not real keen on A2 and B3, but the rest is very good. The payoff cut here is 'Post Toastee' the only place that Bolin really lets loose on the guitar. I remember hearing this song on the radio while still in high school and wondering who it even was. Once I found out and then saw the album cover, instincts told me to avoid. And that was the right call at the time. Today I'm waffling on keeping this, but that one track is exceptional. So I'll keep it for today. Unfortunately this was to be Bolin's last work, dying of a drug overdose at the young age of 25.
Ownership: 1976 Columbia (LP)
4/28/15; 1/27/25 (new review)
In recent years I've inexplicably acquired a taste for later era Deep Purple. As I reflect back, The House of Blue Light would have been the first album I'd ignored entirely and that remained the case until only the last few years. My reunion with Perfect Strangers went much better than expected, and I hear this album very similar to that one. So why would that be the case? I think real time, to my ears at least, these old dinosaur rockers weren't bringing anything new. Blues based hard rock was ever pervasive on the radio and honestly a bit tired by then. Forgetting my initial deep diving into the 70s European underground for a moment, I was also tracking current metal trends, in particular on the thrash side. That was where my high energy dollars were going. Not hard rock retreads.
Today I hear a band that was embracing their past while begrudgingly giving into some 80s trends. Essentially it's retro hard rock 15 years before anyone would think of such a thing. While some of the production techniques remind us of the 80s synth pop bands, Blackmore's guitar is still rooted in the 70s past. Gillan sounds great, though less emotional than his best works. He seems to be emulating Dio oddly enough. Sure 'Call of the Wild' can be skipped (not really a bad song, just the wrong band to perform it). 'Hard Lovin' Woman' has the right title but the perkiness doesn't match. The rest of Side 2 is where the revelation is. One wonders if many fans had the patience to get that far. Every track is a winner and Blackmore lets loose more than usual. 'Dead or Alive' is a great closer where Jon Lord finally shows up with his Hammond B3 and they get into an updated 'Highway Star' solo trade off.
Certainly not suggesting that The House of Blue Light is the pick of the Deep Purple litter, and I'll probably sell it at some point. But it's much better than I expected.
Ownership: 1987 Mercury promo (LP)
6/4/24 (new review)
Below I wrote for the follow up album Fireball: "While seemingly half of Europe was copying Deep Purple - In Rock's innovations with hard rock, the band themselves regressed back into blues rock." In hearing In Rock for the first time in many years, I think I managed to underestimate it. Every track is a hard rock winner, with Blackmore and Lord trading the heaviest solos of their career. Ian Gillan provides the blueprint for every hard rock, and later, heavy metal vocalist. Paice and Glover are on fire here. 'Child in Time' is a track for the ages. Ownership: 1973 Warner Bros. (LP). Gatefold.
1986 (first listen); 2006; 2/2/23 (review)
Deep Purple's 3rd album is an odd bird to be sure. It's a ship without an anchor. Is it prog? psych? hard rock? The answer is yes. They really have a great sound here with Blackmore displaying more of an acid tone than usual and Lord's Hammond way out front. This was to be the end of Mk. 1, before the band decided to rip their shirts open to show their hairy chest while their balls clanged to the ground. It was the right move at the right time, and Deep Purple are legends because of the variation of the band known as Mk 2. What would have happened had they continued with Evans and Simper? Hard to know but likely they would have stayed regional and ultimately faded away - one more 60s English band that is more a footnote than one with a true historical legacy.
In any event, I like this 3rd album - as quirky as The Book of Taliesyn that preceded it. No major highlights but an easy album on the ears that doesn't ask too much from the listener.
CD comes with five bonus tracks, two from a single and three taken from BBC radio sessions.
Ownership: 2003 Purple Japan (CD). Extra thick gatefold papersleeve. 7//05; 12/4/22 (review)Whitesnake - Lovehunter (1979)
A real outlier in RTs collection. "I liked the cover" he tells me. Well yea, can't argue that point! Lyrically these guys were really plugged into the macho oversexed culture of the day. Today they would be cancelled for being sexist pigs. Which is, of course, what they were... Musically it's still the same old bluesy hard rock that one would hear from 1973. So they had fallen way behind on that front. Ultimately they would catch up with the era they lived in (see our notes on the 1987 album). A pretty good album, but nothing that really stands out.
Source: 1979 United Artists (LP)
11/24/21 (review)
While seemingly half of Europe was copying Deep Purple - In Rock's innovations with hard rock, the band themselves regressed back into blues rock. At least for the first side. Though the opening title track is a burner, the rest takes us back to the late 60s pre-proggy era of Purple, and is shockingly ordinary. Side 2, however, makes up for it and picks up where the last album left off. Much more interesting and creative hard rock - though not trailblazing. When it's 1971, you are Deep Purple, and your album is named Fireball, one presumes you'll get more than this. Led Zeppelin, for their part, put out 'Stairway to Heaven' among other tracks etched into our collective DNA's. You think they created some separation there in the public's mind? Oh yea. Meanwhile Black Sabbath was dominating the underground with Master of Reality. Most people here couldn't name one song on Fireball, as none of these made it out of the early 70s as far as American FM radio was concerned. They were to make up for all of this in a big way the following year with Machine Head. But they lost some ground in 1971, a most pivotal year.Ownership: 2000 Warner Bros. / Rhino (CD). Full written history, new photos, vintage posters, old reviews, and multiple relevant bonus tracks including a 45 single. An excellent reissue.2//06; 8/13/16; 3/25/17; 10/23/22 (review)
Trapeze - Meduza (1970)
Trapeze's second album is a solid hard rock work, one step ahead of the more blues oriented competition. The band is most known for contributing Glenn Hughes to Deep Purple and Dave Holland to Judas Priest (later), though they had a nice career throughout the 70s. Guitarist Mel Galley found success with Whitesnake as well. Speaking of Judas Priest, one can hear their prototype on tracks like 'Jury' and 'Medusa'. Not a life changing album, but this is good meat and potatoes hard rock.Ownership: 1970 Threshold (LP). Gatefold. 8/26/22 (review)
The hype sticker on my copy screams "Destiny Brought Them Together. Again." So we'll presume then that it was destiny that intervened and broke them up. Again. Or it could just be that Blackmore and Gillan couldn't stand each other. But on this reunion of the famous "Mk. II" band, their first together since 1973, the band sounded fresh. 1984 was an odd time for an old fashioned hard rock band to be trying to make a comeback in a world full of heavy metal bands and New Wave pop artists. Undeterred, Deep Purple did just that. The title track sounding more classic Led Zeppelin than Deep Purple, nonetheless they caught fire and Deep Purple were back in the limelight for the first time in a decade. Jon Lord's organ hasn't changed one bit (no need for cheap synthesizers), Blackmore is ripping solos in his inimitable way, and Gillan is still sounding like a virile young man. The only downside is that Glover and Paice did decide to sound more 80s, and the wide open beats are too simple for these guys. 'Burn' this is not. All the same, a triumphant comeback album.Ownership: 1984 Mercury (LP). Lyric insert.
1984 (first listen); 12/29/21 (review)
One of my favorite pastimes of late is enjoying past-their-prime releases of known bands. Uriah Heep, Saxon, and... now add Deep Purple to that list. If nothing else, gives me something to look for while combing the thrift shop CD bins. I had a grade on this from before, but I don't remember a thing about it, which tells me I probably heard it real time. Back then I wasn't so keen on these "has-beens" trying to stay relevant. I also didn't give it a chance I'm sure. In reflection, I'm hearing the classic Deep Purple sound 20+ years from their best years. And when one looks at the line-up, it's Mk. 2 with Steve Morse instead of Blackmore on guitar. Which is sacrilege for many, but Blackmore left Purple behind a couple of times, and hasn't looked back since 1993. So what's a band to do - quit? No. Persevere. Bands as brands as I've said many times before. This is pretty much 70s hard rock with Hammond organ (yep, the old warhorse Jon Lord is still banging away on the heavy piece of wood) and Morse providing a more updated guitar approach (i.e. more notes per minute). Gillan sounds great, and his bluesy voice is timeless. Paice and Glover are a machine by this point. Good set of tunes. What else do you need? Ownership: 1996 Prominent (CD) 10/22/21 (review)
Clearly Deep Purple were going towards heady waters with a title and cover like this, especially for 1968. In fact, Deep Purple had to make a conscious decision to move away from prog and over to hard rock eventually, and it was there they found fame and fortune. I had my best listen in 35 years this go round (+1). Really appreciating Jon Lord's Hammond organ contributions at this point of the group's career.Ownership: 1971 Harvest (LP). Gatefold. UK pressing1986; 2//05; 10/19/21 (review)
I remember when this album first came out, and the track I heard was 'Still of the Night'. Based on that, I purchased the LP. To great disappointment. And sold the LP in the mid 90s (if not before). Once I saw this special edition, I thought this would be a good chance to hear it again. The CD opens with - you guessed it - 'Still of the Night'. Which is not how the originals started, but makes sense in retrospect. It's a foot stomper of a track. Huge fat chords, heavy beats, and creative passages. It's a no wonder I was drawn to this album originally. And that's pretty much it for that style. Certainly tracks like 'Bad Boys' and 'Children of the Night' bring it as well, and have earned their hard rock street cred. But boy is this an album of the 80s or what? Big hair, beautiful bodies, and little brain use. 'Is This Love?' is pathetic - gee, I don't know - is it? I'm pretty sure the only things these guys would have known is 'Is this Sex?'. 'Here I Go Again' is the kind of track one would think a time traveler would make about 80s music, it's such a caricature of the entire genre. We can criticize this album all day long, but this is exactly what audiences wanted back then. It does have a time and place charm, that's for sure. I'm keeping it. File next to your mousse can.Ownership: 2007 EMI Europe (CD + DVD). 20th Anniversary Special Edition. Double digi-pak with four live tracks.
1987 (first listen); 3/6/21 (review)
Warhorse (1970)
Ownership: 1999 Angel Air (CD). Liner notes, photos and five bonus tracks. Four are live versions from the album proper, and the other is the demo track 'Miss Jane', which was best left on the cutting room floor.
2005; 5/4/19 (review)
Warhorse - Red Sea (1972)
Add another name to those who feel disappointed by this effort. I had that somewhat cheap looking Thunderbolt vinyl reissue going back to the 80s, and sold it not long after, as I was nonplussed about the music from the get. However, I picked up the Angel Air CD about a decade ago, and thought it good enough to keep. This relisten validates my initial assessment.
In hearing it again, it becomes obvious why most folks tend to appreciate the album, including myself. The first two tracks are excellent, sounding exactly what one expects of Warhorse: That of Mk. 1 Deep Purple emulating Mk. 2. But the appropriately titled 'Confident But Wrong' shows the frayed strands of creativity, and introduces us to four very ordinary rock and roll tracks that are a slog to sit through. Though the lengthy 'Mouthpiece' looks alluring on paper, one quickly realizes there's not much but a skeleton of a song there, with an overlong drum solo to boot. 'I (Who Have Nothing)' begins to turn the corner with its shrieking Ian Gillan-like pleas, but it's clearly too late, and this warhorse has already sunk to the bottom of the sea. And this would be the end for the once promising hard rock band.
Given the pedigree of the band, this album was somewhat "mainstream" in real time, and was pressed in multiple countries. Surprisingly, though, it did not receive a US pressing.
Former ownership: 1999 Angel Air (CD)
2005; 7/10/16 (review)
2005; 7/10/16 (review)
No comments:
Post a Comment